Harmon Reid LLP is a mid-size litigation firm with 30 attorneys and 12 support staff. Primary practice: syndication and commercial litigation. Approximately $15M in annual revenue [measured]. The firm was running on email, shared drives, and institutional knowledge held by 3 senior partners — none of it systematized.
Harmon Reid's attorneys were burning billable capacity on work that had nothing to do with legal strategy. Document assembly for syndication deals — with 80% identical boilerplate — was taking 12+ hours of senior attorney time per deal [estimated]. Matter intake arrived by email with no routing system, sitting unassigned for an average of 2 days. Billing reconciliation required 8 hours of manual cross-reference per week. And clients were calling 15+ times a week asking "where is my case?" — because nothing was automated to tell them.
Harmon Reid's engagement followed the Coriven Method across all four phases. Total engagement cost: $18,000 [measured]. Total client time invested: ~28 hours [estimated].
Assessed 3 operational domains — document production, matter intake, and billing operations — through interviews with 2 senior partners, 4 associates, and 2 support staff. Shadowed the syndication deal workflow end-to-end. Timed document assembly for 2 live deals. Identified 5 findings totaling 50+ attorney and staff hours per week of recoverable work. Scored each finding on business impact, billable leverage, implementation complexity, team readiness, and risk profile.
Built an automated document assembly system for 6 syndication deal types using a clause library and parameter-driven templates (Finding 1). Configured intake routing via the firm's existing matter management software — no new tools required (Finding 2). Integrated timekeeping with invoicing to eliminate reconciliation (Finding 3). Set up automated client milestone notifications triggered by matter status changes (Finding 4). Drafted playbooks for top 3 deal types using interview sessions with senior partners (Finding 5).
Trained all 30 attorneys and 12 support staff on the document assembly system in 3 role-specific sessions: senior partners (review + customization), associates (template usage), and support staff (intake routing + client communication). Attorney adoption of template system reached 85% within 2 weeks. Intake routing workflow adopted by all support staff day 1. Billing reconciliation automation went live without training — it just worked.
Measured at 30, 60, and 90 days. Document assembly time tracked by attorney time entries before and after. Intake routing time tracked in matter management log. Billing reconciliation hours tracked by billing coordinator time log. Client call volume tracked against phone system records. Every number tagged [measured] or [estimated]. Attorney time on billable work increased from 55% to 74% of working hours — 19 points recovered. [measured]
Each finding scored on a 5-point weighted model: business impact, billable leverage, implementation complexity, team readiness, and risk profile.
| Finding | Score | Before | After (90 days) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Document Assembly — Repetitive Templates
Legal Ops · Billable Leverage
|
4.65 Do First | 12+ hrs per deal, 80% identical clauses, senior attorney time [estimated] | ~2 hrs per deal — attorneys review and customize only [measured] |
|
Matter Intake — Email-Based, Unrouted
Practice Ops · Process Friction
|
4.20 Do First | Shared inbox, avg 2-day delay to assignment, no routing logic [estimated] | Automated routing on receipt — avg 4 hrs to assignment [measured] |
|
Billing Reconciliation — Manual Cross-Reference
Finance Ops · Manual Effort
|
4.00 Do First | 8 hrs/week, two systems, monthly errors found on reconciliation [estimated] | Fully automated — direct integration, 8 hrs/week recovered [measured] |
|
Client Communication — No Status Automation
Client Experience · Manual Effort
|
3.75 Do Next | 15+ status calls/week, handled by attorneys and support staff [estimated] | Automated milestone emails on matter advancement — calls down 80% [measured] |
|
Knowledge Trapped in Senior Partners
Practice Risk · Process Documentation
|
2.90 Plan For | No documented playbooks for any deal type — critical key-person dependency [estimated] | Playbooks drafted for top 3 deal types — knowledge transfer in progress [measured] |
Document assembly time per syndication deal dropped from 12+ hours to ~2 hours [measured]. Billing reconciliation fully automated — 8 hrs/week recovered immediately [measured].
All five findings were addressed in Phase 1. Phase 2 extends the document template library to additional deal types and completes the knowledge base — reducing the firm's dependency on senior partner availability for routine matters.
We find where your attorneys are losing billable time, build the fix, train your team, and prove it worked with real numbers. Starting at $7,500 for a 4-week sprint.
Start the Conversation →Disclaimer: This case study is based on a simulated engagement using the Coriven Method. "Harmon Reid LLP" is a representative company profile. All findings reflect the methodology Coriven applies to real engagements. Numbers tagged [measured] reflect verified data within the simulation. Numbers tagged [estimated] are calculated from baseline data and implementation modeling. Actual results vary.
All numbers carry measurement tags — [measured] or [estimated] — because we believe in transparency. If we can't measure it, we say so.